<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: C# Null pass-through extension method</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dotnetanywhere.org/index.php/2009/03/c-null-pass-through-extension-method/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dotnetanywhere.org/index.php/2009/03/c-null-pass-through-extension-method/</link>
	<description>.NET CIL interpreter for embedded systems</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 12:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://dotnetanywhere.org/index.php/2009/03/c-null-pass-through-extension-method/comment-page-1/#comment-1117</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 09:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dotnetanywhere.org/?p=72#comment-1117</guid>
		<description>And what is wrong with:

int len = (c == null &amp;&amp; String.IsNullOrEmpty(c.str)) ? 0 : c.str.Length;

?

It doesn't look like your code has gotten that much shorter. 
I do understand that lambda syntax looks more elegant than old style. But imho sometimes it just obscures the meaning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what is wrong with:</p>
<p>int len = (c == null &amp;&amp; String.IsNullOrEmpty(c.str)) ? 0 : c.str.Length;</p>
<p>?</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t look like your code has gotten that much shorter.<br />
I do understand that lambda syntax looks more elegant than old style. But imho sometimes it just obscures the meaning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

